999 Third Avenue
Suite 3000
Seattle, WA 98104
206.682.3333 phone
206.340.8856 fax

 

Native Americans face unique legal challenges that are becoming ever more complex in today's changing world. We pride ourselves on our historic work with tribal leaders, program staff and reservation attorneys across the country to problem-solve and identify innovative solutions to both new and age-old problems.

For more than 30 years, our attorneys have relied upon their unparalleled experience to navigate – and where necessary, to pave the way – through the complicated terrain that lies at the crossroads of federal, tribal and state laws and their associated regulations. By understanding the unique nature of Indian law, our attorneys are positioned to meet the diverse needs and interests of Native American tribes, tribal business enterprises and other tribal instrumentalities. This unique expertise is invaluable not only for our tribal clients, but also for non-tribal clients who seek to conduct business in Indian Country.

Although our goal is to resolve matters whenever possible by working collaboratively with federal agencies, state and local governments, other tribes and private entities, our attorneys have extensive experience litigating issues that are unique to tribes. We have successfully represented tribes in federal district courts, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court, tribal courts and administrative agencies.

For more information, select one of the topics listed below.

General Issues

We draw upon the skills and expertise of attorneys throughout the firm to provide a wide range of legal services to tribes and tribal members, including:
  • Tribal sovereignty and governance
  • Jurisdiction and venue matters
  • Drafting and revising tribal laws, ordinances, resolutions, bylaws and codes
  • Legislative counseling and advocacy
  • Tribal business regulatory compliance
  • Real estate, land use and fee-to-trust transactions
  • Reservation boundary disputes
  • Construction projects on tribal lands
  • Government permits and approvals
  • Federal, tribal and state taxation issues
  • Labor and employment issues
  • Bankruptcy protection
  • Public and media relations
  • Public involvement and stakeholder issues management

Tribal Environment & Natural Resources Law

Our extensive tribal experience has enabled us to serve as Special Environmental Counsel to tribal governments on a broad array of environmental, natural resource and cultural issues, including:
  • Tribal environmental program development
  • Treaty-based hunting and fishing rights and reserved water rights
  • Cultural resource and sacred site protection
  • Treatment-as-state status under the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act
  • Federal environmental grants and funding
  • Tribal brownfields redevelopment
  • Intergovernmental cooperative agreements and state-tribal compacts
  • Natural resource damage claims
  • National Environmental Policy Act compliance
  • Tribal Endangered Species Act issues
  • Pollution prevention in economic development
  • Hydropower dam relicensing under FERC

Articles and Presentations

Our attorneys regularly prepare and present articles and presentations to local, regional and national audiences on issues of concern to Native Americans.

Our Tribal Practice Group conducts an annual Tribal environmental seminar (TES) for Tribal leaders, Tribal environmental program managers and in-house counsel.  Themes for our previous TES have included the following:

2013 - Balancing the Scales of Justice: The strategic use of administrative and judicial litigation to further Tribal interests

2012 - The Inherent Sovereign Authority of Tribal Government to Protect the Reservation Environment.

2011 - Protecting Reservation Water Resources – Tools to Preserve the Quality and Quantity of Tribal Water Rights and Water Resources.

2010 - How litigation has shaped Tribal environmental law and the future role of litigation in protecting Tribal environmental interests.

2009 - Assessing natural resource damage in Tribal areas and how to protect the Tribe’s natural resources for future generations.

2008 - Using the media as a tool in identifying and resolving Tribal environmental issues.

2007 - Climate change and the impact on treaty-protected rights.

2006 - Protection of Tribal natural resources.

2005 - Tribal sovereignty: protection of Tribal water rights.

2004 - Tribal sovereignty: Developing Brownfields and establishing intergovernmental relationships.

2003 - Tribal sovereignty: Developing and promoting Tribal civil regulatory authority.

2002 - Protecting Tribal reserved water and environmental quality rights for future generations.

2001 - A seminar for Tribal environmental professionals and resource managers.

2000 - The role of Tribal governments in FERC hydropower dam relicensing proceedings.

Success Stories

2012

Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation Win Trial on Liability for Transboundary Environmental Contamination

SCB congratulates its client, the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, for prevailing in its trial seeking environmental cleanup liability against Canadian smelting giant, Teck Metals, Ltd. After eight years of hard-fought litigation, the Tribes obtained a federal court ruling holding Teck liable for its decades-long practice of contaminating the Upper Columbia River. For more information, see the Tribes' press release posted to SCB's Environmental Law Blog.

2011

SCB Congratulates Co-Plaintiff State of Washington on its Summary Judgment Victory

SCB represents the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, the plaintiff in litigation under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, known as the federal Superfund Act) against Teck Metals, Ltd. regarding environmental contamination in the Columbia River. On November 29, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington denied Teck's motion asking the court to determine as a matter of law that the Tribes' co-plaintiff, the State of Washington, is a liable party under the Superfund Act. Teck argued that the State was liable as an "arranger" for permitting mining and related activities in the region under written contracts. The court disagreed, finding that the State was not liable. For more information about SCB's Tribal and Environmental Litigation practice, please contact Richard Du Bey, Paul Dayton, or Leslie Clark (206.682.3333 or rdubey@scblaw.com or pdayton@scblaw.com or lclark@scblaw.com).